La Conferenza rappresenta da sempre un momento ottimale per il confronto interdisciplinare, grazie alla presentazione di nuovi comandi sviluppati dagli utenti e di applicazioni basate su metodologie recentemente introdotte in Stata.
L’evento si aprirà con la sessione Invited Speaker, affidata a Scott Cunningham, Ben H. Williams Professor of Economics, Baylor University, che presenterà “AI Agents for Research Workers”.
A seguire, una serie di sessioni tematiche offrirà ai partecipanti l’opportunità di:
- SCAMBIARE informazioni e nuove routines sviluppate per Stata;
- CONOSCERE nuove applicazioni che evidenziano le potenzialità di Stata su nuovi comandi e procedure;
- INCONTRARE ricercatori provenienti da diverse aree disciplinari favorendo confronto, dialogo e nuove collaborazioni.
Da StataCorp interverranno Di Liu e Kristin MacDonalid, con le seguenti presentazioni:
Conditional Average Treatment-effects estimation using Stata • Di Liu, Principal Econometrician, StataCorp
Treatment effects estimate the causal effects of a treatment on an outcome. The effect may be heterogeneous. Average treatment effects conditional on a set of variables (CATEs) help us understand heterogeneous treatment effects. By construction, they are useful to evaluate how different treatment-assignment policies affect different groups in the population. Di Liu illustrates how to use Stata 19’s new command cate to answer questions such as the following: Are the treatment effects heterogeneous?; How do the treatment effects vary with some variables?; Do the treatment effects vary across prespecified groups?; Are there unknown groups in the data for which treatment effects differ?; Which is best among possible treatment-assignment rules?
Generalized structural equation models: GLMs, multilevel, latent classes, and more • Kristin MacDonald, Executive Director of Statistical Services, StataCorp
Stata’s gsem command fits generalized structural equation models. This generalization allows user to fit structural equation models with continuous, binary, ordinal, categorical, count, and survival-time outcomes. Users can also fit models with continuous or categorical latent variables. Multilevel models are also supported. In this presentation, it will be demonstrated a wide variety of models that can be fit with gsem, from multilevel confirmatory factor models to latent class models. Along the way, participants will see both typical SEM applications and unique models that can be fit in the generalized SEM framework.
Saranno particolarmente gradite presentazioni di:
- NUOVI COMANDI / ROUTINES
- nuovi metodi di stima;
- nuove routines sviluppate semplicemente per rendere la vita più facile in Stata;
- connettività di Stata con applicazioni esterne come Python, R o Java; automazione avanzata del flusso di lavoro degli utenti e strumenti di reporting per la creazione di dashboards o per la pubblicazione automatica su Internet;
- visualizzazione dei dati;
- STUDI APPLICATI con l’utilizzo di comandi / funzioni / metodologie rilasciate recentemente in Stata19.
Il secondo giorno del meeting sarà dedicato al Conference Workshop Modern Difference-in-Differences: New Problems, New Solutions tenuto da Scott Cunningham.
COME SOTTOPORRE UN CONTRIBUTO
Gli autori sono invitati a sottoporre il proprio abstract, entro il 30.07.2026, a conference@tstat.it. Nell’e-mail indicare nome, affiliazione, indirizzo e recapito telefonico. Il contributo può essere presentato, secondo la volontà dell’autore, in italiano o in inglese. Per ciascuna presentazione saranno disponibili 25 minuti oltre 10 minuti per eventuali domande. La sessione Tips and Tricks accoglierà, invece, proposte da 5 a 25 minuti. Contributi che dovessero richiedere tempi diversi saranno comunque ben accolti, ma sarà necessario segnalarne la durata prevista al momento dell’invio dell’abstract.
Il Comitato Scientifico farà pervenire una risposta entro il 05.08.2026 e la versione definitiva del lavoro dovrà essere inoltrata entro e non oltre il 05.09.2026.
Clicca qui per scaricare la versione PDF del Call for Papers.
Click here to download the Call for Papers in PDF format.
PROGRAMMA | 17 SETTEMBRE
8.30 – 9.00 Registrazione dei partecipanti
9.00 – 9.45 SESSIONE I – INVITED SPEAKER
AI Agents for Research Workers • Scott Cunningham, Baylor University
In this year’s invited session, Scott Cunningham turns to a development few applied researchers can now choose to ignore: the arrival of AI coding agents in the empirical workflow. Data cleaning, model estimation, visualization and replication are all tasks increasingly open to delegation. In this session, Scott discusses where these tools genuinely help, where they mislead, and what their use implies for the reliability and reproducibility of published research.
9.45 – 11.05 SESSIONE II – COMMUNITY CONTRIBUTED COMMANDS, I
fffuroot • Giovanni Bruno, Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi di Milano
Implementing in Stata unit-root and stationarity tests with smooth breaks approximated by flexible Fourier forms. I describe the Stata implementation of unit-root and stationarity tests with flexible Fourier forms as in Enders and Lee (2012a), (2012b) and Becker, Enders and Lee (2006).
xtthreshold: Panel Data Threshold Regression with Interactive Fixed Effects • Jan Ditzen, Libera Università di Bolzano; Yiannis Karavias, Brunel University of London e Joakim Westerlund, Lund University
Threshold regression provides a flexible framework for capturing regime – dependent relationships, and has become a widely used tool for uncovering structural breaks, nonlinearities, and state-dependent patterns in data across diverse fields. This presentation introduces a new community contributed command called xtthreshold, which provides researchers with a complete toolbox for analysing threshold regression in panel data with interactive fixed effects. The new command is able to estimate both discontinuous threshold regression and kink regression, both with interactive fixed effects. It further accommodates three alternative specifications of slope heterogeneity: fully homogeneous, fully heterogeneous, and semi-homogeneous models. Model selection is facilitated by a modified information criterion capable of discriminating among competing specifications, and inference is supported through confidence intervals and hypothesis testing for all model parameters, in a addition to bootstrap-based tests for the existence of non-linearity.
Earning While Learning: How to Run Batched Bandit Experiments • Davud Rostam-Afschar e Jan Kemper, University of Mannheim
Researchers typically collect experimental data sequentially, allowing early outcome observations and adaptive treatment assignment to reduce exposure to inferior treatments. This article reviews multi-armed-bandit adaptive experimental designs that balance exploration and exploitation. Because adaptively collected experimental data through bandit algorithms violate standard asymptotics, inference is challenging. We implement an estimator that yields valid heteroskedasticity-robust confidence intervals in batched bandit designs and compare coverage in Monte Carlo simulations. We introduce bbandits for Stata, a tool for designing experiments via simulation, running interactive bandit experiments, and implementing and analyzing adaptively collected data. bbandits includes three common assignment algorithms—ε-first, ε-greedy, and Thompson sampling—and supports estimation, inference, and visualization.
rdlasso: Regression Discontinuity with High-Dimensional Data • Marianna Nitti e Marco Ventura, Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza
We present a command, rdlasso, which enables the inclusion of highdimensional covariates in Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD) settings. This command is based on the paper “Inference in Regression Discontinuity Designs with High-Dimensional Covariates” by Kreiss and Rothe (2023). The command automates covariate selection using Lasso-based procedures, supports both sharp and fuzzy settings and integrates seamlessly with rdrobust for bandwidth selection and inference. The command relies on Stata’s native implementation of lasso for high-dimensional covariate selection and on rdrobust for bandwidth selection, estimation, and inference, making the methodology both accessible to Stata users and computationally feasible for applied researchers.
11.05 – 11.20 Pausa caffè
11.20 – 12.45 SESSIONE III – EXPLOITING THE POTENTIAL OF STATA 19, I
Generalized structural equation models: GLMs, multilevel, latent class and more • Kristin MacDonald, StataCorp
Stata’s gsem command fits generalized structural equation models. This generalization allows user to fit structural equation models with continuous, binary, ordinal, categorical, count, and survival-time outcomes. Users can also fit models with continuous or categorical latent variables. Multilevel models are also supported. In this presentation, it will be demonstrated a wide variety of models that can be fit with gsem, from multilevel confirmatory factor models to latent class models. Along the way, participants will see both typical SEM applications and unique models that can be fit in the generalized SEM framework.
Beyond Evidence Synthesis: A Meta-Analytic Framework for Explaining Heterogeneous Dynamic Parameters • Maria Elena Bontempi, Università degli Studi di Bologna
Meta-analysis is traditionally used to synthesize evidence across independent studies. This paper illustrates a nonstandard application of Stata’s multivariate meta-analysis framework to investigate parameter heterogeneity estimated from firm-level dynamic models. The empirical motivation comes from corporate finance, where heterogeneous adjustment dynamics make pooled panel specifications with numerous interactions difficult to interpret.
We first estimate fully heterogeneous error-correction models for individual firms, obtaining firm-specific parameters measuring the speed of leverage adjustment, the sensitivity to free cash flow, and debt-maturity interaction, together with their estimated standard errors. Rather than treating these parameters as final estimates, we use Stata’s multivariate random-effects meta-regression to explain their cross-sectional heterogeneity through firm characteristics, contractual features, and institutional changes.
The paper demonstrates how Stata’s meta commands can be extended beyond their conventional role of evidence synthesis to provide a flexible second-stage modelling framework for heterogeneous parameter estimates. The approach accommodates multiple correlated outcomes, accounts for estimation uncertainty through inversevariance weighting, and avoids the overparameterization that often arises in pooled interaction models. Although illustrated using a novel dataset on corporate debt covenants extracted from SEC filings, the methodology is applicable to any context in which unit-specific parameters are estimated in a first stage and subsequently related to observed characteristics.
14.00-15.20 SESSIONE IV – STATA TIPS AND TRICKS
Building Desktop Applications for Stata Using Python • Giovanni Cerulli, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, CNRIRCrES
Stata is one of the most widely used environments for statistical analysis, but many workflows still require users to interact directly with the command line or do-files. This presentation illustrates how Python can be used to build lightweight desktop graphical user interfaces (GUIs) that interact seamlessly with Stata, allowing users to launch complex analyses through intuitive point-and-click applications. The presentation will discuss the architecture of the communication between Python and Stata, practical implementation details, and possible extensions.
adoadd • Jan Ditzen, Libera Università di Bolzano
adoadd is a package developed to control Stata’s ado environment.
13.10-14.15 Pranzo
15.35-16.35 SESSIONE V – COMMUNITY CONTRIBUTED COMMANDS, II
wqsreg – a Stata command for Weighted Quantile Sum regression • Marta Ponzano, Università degli Studi Link di Roma; Stefano Renzetti, Università degli Studi di Parma e Andrea Bellavia, T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard Medical School
Weighted Quantile Sum (WQS) regression is a statistical method for quantifying the association between a set of possibly correlated predictors and a health outcome, estimating the joint effect of the predictors as well as their individual contributions to the total effect. We present wqsreg, the first Stata command for WQS regression, implemented for continuous, binary and count outcomes. The execution of the command involves two sequential steps: 1) estimating the weights and constructing the WQS index under specific constraints; 2) modeling its association with the outcome. wqsreg integrates several flexible components of the framework such as bootstrap, training/validation, and repeated holdout procedures; it returns regression estimates as well as graphical displays of the individual weights. We present an application of the command on exposome data exploring the association between 38 exposures and a continuous outcome while adjusting for a set of covariates. To the best of our knowledge, wqsreg provides the first command to conduct WQS regression in Stata. We anticipate that our contribution will further promote the use of appropriate statistical methods for handling multiple correlated predictors.
Assessing the functional form of the Cox model: the stfform command • Daniele Spinelli e Rino Bellocco, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca
We introduce stfform, a post-estimation command for stcox that allows users to assess the functional form of continuous covariates in Cox proportional hazards regression models using cumulative sums of martingale residuals. By complementing graphical diagnostics with a formal statistical test, stfform provides a principled assessment of the adequacy of the specified functional form.
catmetrics: computing 300 measures of association, similarity and forecast evaluation for categorical data • Andrei Sirchenko, Nyenrode Business University; Dragoş Bînzari e Konrad Wrębiak, University of Amsterdam
This article introduces catmetrics, a new Stata command for computing various measures of association, similarity, and deterministic and probabilistic forecast evaluation for categorical data. The command accommodates binary, nominal, and ordinal multicategory data. It reports over 300 distinct measures, providing their alternative names across various disciplines and their attainable ranges. Furthermore, in addition to overall metrics, catmetrics calculates classspecific quantities for each category, as well as their macro and weighted averages.
16.35-17.40 SESSIONE VI – EXPLOITING THE POTENTIAL OF STATA 19, II
Conditional Average Treatment-effects estimation using Stata • Di Liu, StataCorp
Treatment effects estimate the causal effects of a treatment on an outcome. The effect may be heterogeneous. Average treatment effects conditional on a set of variables (CATEs) help us understand heterogeneous treatment effects. By construction, they are useful to evaluate how different treatment-assignment policies affect different groups in the population.
In this talk, we will show how to use Stata 19’s new command cate to answer questions such as the following:
1. Are the treatment effects heterogeneous?
2. How do the treatment effects vary with some variables?
3. Do the treatment effects vary across prespecified groups?
4. Are there unknown groups in the data for which treatment effects differ?
5. Which is best among possible treatment-assignment rules?
Optimal Policy Learning under Constraints in Stata • Giovanni Cerulli, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, CNR-IRCrES
Optimal Policy Learning (OPL) has emerged as a powerful framework for designing data-driven treatment allocation rules that maximize social welfare while accounting for treatment effect heterogeneity. In many real-world policy applications, however, decision makers face operational constraints such as limited budgets, minimum coverage requirements, or combinations of both, making unconstrained policy learning impractical. This presentation introduces a comprehensive Stata implementation for constrained Optimal Policy Learning that enables researchers and practitioners to estimate, evaluate, and compare treatment assignment policies under realistic resource limitations. The framework integrates modern causal machine learning methods for estimating Conditional Average Treatment Effects (CATEs) with efficient optimization algorithms that solve budget-constrained, coverage-constrained, and joint constrained allocation problems. We discuss the underlying theoretical framework, the computational implementation, and the associated Stata commands, illustrating their use through empirical examples and simulation evidence. The proposed tools provide an accessible and reproducible environment for translating heterogeneous treatment effect estimates into implementable policy recommendations, thereby bridging the gap between causal inference, machine learning, and evidence-based policy design within the Stata ecosystem.
How to deal with confounders in survival curves; a short (useful) review • Rino Bellocco, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca
In observational studies, where the end-point is time to event, often we must deal with the issue of confounding which can potentially bias the association between the exposure and the outcome of interest. In my presentation, I will present an overview of the methods proposed for controlling for confounders, from regular simple Stata options to more advanced procedures.
16.40 – 16.55 Pausa caffè
16.55 – 17.40 SESSIONE VII – EXPLOITING THE POTENTIAL OF STATA 19, III
Stress Testing Guaranteed Minimum Income Schemes: A Counterfactual Microsimulation Framework Using EU-SILC • Ewa Aksman, University of Warsaw
This paper develops a counterfactual microsimulation framework for evaluating the fiscal consequences of Guaranteed Minimum Income (GMI) schemes under adverse labour supply responses. The framework combines a theoretical cost-effectiveness measure based on the Lorenz curve and the Gini coefficient with an empirical implementation using EU-SILC microdata in Stata. It enables a systematic comparison of alternative GMI architectures while quantifying their fiscal implications under identical
behavioural assumptions.
The analysis considers an extreme counterfactual scenario in which all households eligible for GMI—defined as those with disposable incomes below 60% of the relevant median
disposable income—withdraw completely from the labour market. The scenario is intended as a fiscal stress test rather than a behavioural forecast. Two institutional arrangements are compared: (i) decentralized national GMI schemes, where eligibility is defined relative to national median income, and (ii) a centralized EU-wide GMI system, where eligibility ì is defined relative to the EU-wide median income.
The proposed framework is implemented in Stata through a reproducible computational workflow that automates the identification of eligible households, construction of counterfactual income distributions, computation of population-weighted cost-effectiveness indicators, and decomposition of the cost-effectiveness ratio into contributions stemming from between-country and withincountry redistributive effects. The implementation provides a flexible computational environment for evaluating alternative GMI designs under different eligibility thresholds and behavioural assumptions and can be readily adapted to other comparative redistribution analyses based on EU-SILC microdata.
The empirical application shows that complete labour market withdrawal increases total GMI expenditures by 89% under national schemes and by 104% under a centralized EU-wide scheme relative to baseline estimates. Although beneficiary coverage remains unchanged and the redistributive impact of both systems is preserved, fiscal efficiency deteriorates substantially. The proposed framework illustrates how Stata can be used to integrate theoretical distributional analysis with large-scale EU-SILC microsimulation, providing a transparent and reproducible approach for stress-testing alternative social protection policies.
From Health to Debt: A Latent Transition Analysis of Chronic Illness Trajectories and Household Financial Solvency • Karim Asmaa e Abarda Abdallah, Hassan 1st University of Settat
The coexistence of evolving chronic illnesses and financial constraints represents a major challenge for households, particularly in countries where social health coverage remains incomplete. This paper proposes an application of Latent Transition Analysis (LTA) to dynamically model individuals’ chronic health trajectories and assess their influence on household financial solvency.
Using panel data (health status, healthcare expenditures, income, and debt), we identify latent health states (e.g., “stable,” “moderate deterioration,” “severe deterioration”) and estimate the transition probabilities between these states over time. These trajectories are then linked to indicators of financial vulnerability (debt ratio, savings capacity, credit reliance, insurance premiums) in order to assess the extent to which health deterioration increases the risk of household financial fragility.
The expected results will highlight typical at-risk trajectory profiles and estimate the magnitude of the relationship between chronic health status and solvency. This approach offers practical implications for actuarial pricing in health insurance, the design of adapted micro-insurance products, and the orientation of public prevention policies.
Methodologically, all estimations will be carried out using Stata, employing its dedicated commands for latent class models and their longitudinal extension (latent transitions), thereby illustrating Stata’s capabilities for analyzing longitudinal health data applied to economics and insurance.
Geographic Distribution of Smoking and High-Risk Alcohol Consumption in Italy: A Quintile-Based Approach Using PASSI Surveillance Data • Giovanni Capelli, Federica Asta, Valentina Minardi, Benedetta Contoli e Maria Masocco, Istituto Superiore di Sanità
Geographical analysis is a powerful tool for public health surveillance because it allows the visualization of spatial patterns, territorial inequalities and population groups at greater risk. Maps provide an immediate and intuitive representation of epidemiological indicators, supporting the identification of geographic clusters and helping policy makers prioritize prevention strategies and resource allocation. Within the Italian PASSI surveillance system, referred to adult population aged 18-69 years, geographic visualization can enhance the interpretation of behavioral risk factors by highlighting regional differences that may not emerge from national averages alone.
This study presents a geographic analysis of two PASSI indicators, smoking status and high-risk alcohol consumption, using data from the 2024–2025 biennium. Regional estimates were calculated as weighted prevalences through the svy command in Stata, ensuring that the results account for the complex sampling design and are representative of the resident adult population. The indicators were then displayed through thematic maps at the regional level and local level realized through Stata maps visualization commands.
To improve the interpretability of territorial differences, prevalence estimates were classified using quintiles rather than fixed thresholds or comparisons with the national average. Quintile-based classification offers several advantages: it distributes regions more evenly across categories, enhances visual contrast, facilitates the identification of relative geographic gradients, and reduces the risk of masking meaningful variability when indicator distributions are skewed. Unlike classifications centered on a national benchmark, quintiles emphasize the relative position of each region within the overall distribution, providing a clearer picture of territorial inequalities.
The use of weighted prevalence estimates combined with quintile-based thematic mapping represents an effective approach for communicating PASSI surveillance data and supporting evidence-based public health planning. Furthermore, this methodology can be easily extended to finer geographic levels, such as Local Health Authorities (LHAs) and municipalities, allowing the identification of local patterns and inequalities that may be hidden in regional-level analyses.
17:45-18:00 OPEN PANEL DISCUSSION WITH STATA DEVELOPERS • DI LIU AND KRISTIN MACDONALD, STATACORP
La sessione “Open panel discussion with Stata Developers” offre ai partecipanti la possibilità di interagire direttamente con la StataCorp: sarà possibile evidenziare problemi o limitazioni del software nonché suggerire eventuali miglioramenti o comandi che potrebbero essere inclusi in Stata.
20.00 Cena Sociale (opzionale)
Clicca qui per scaricare la versione PDF del programma in Italiano.
Click here to download the program in PDF format.
Nel secondo giorno della Conferenza si terrà il corso di formazione “MODERN DIFFERENCE-IN-DIFFERENCES: NEW PROBLEMS, NEW SOLUTIONS” – Scott Cunningham
On the second day of the Italian Stata Users Conference will be offered the training course “MODERN DIFFERENCE-IN-DIFFERENCES: NEW PROBLEMS, NEW SOLUTIONS” – Scott Cunningham
La conferenza si terrà il 17-18 Settembre a Milano presso l’Hotel “UNA Hotels Century Milano“.
| Conferenza | Conferenza e Corso di Formazione | |
| Studenti e Dottorandi*
full-time |
€ 60.00 | € 195.00 |
| Altre categorie | € 110.00 | € 420.00 |
I prezzi si intendono IVA 22% esclusa. L’aliquota IVA non sarà applicata per Enti Pubblici soggetti ad esenzione a norma dell’art. 14 c. 10 della L. 537/93 per la partecipazione a corsi di formazione dei propri dipendenti.
*Per usufruire dello status “studente” è necessario presentare un certificato di iscrizione (in carta semplice) all’Università ed essere studenti a tempo pieno.
PROGETTO INVESTIRE NEI GIOVANI RICERCATORI
TStat è lieta di offrire a 2 dottorandi (iscritti a tempo pieno) la giornata del Convegno e del Workshop, grazie al progetto “Investire nei giovani ricercatori” con il quale si pone l’obiettivo di sostenere il percorso formativo di giovani ricercatori nei Paesi dove è distributore del software Stata.
Per ulteriori informazioni contattare la segreteria organizzativa, oppure inviare direttamente il modulo di registrazione entro il 10.09.2026.
CONFERENCE WORKSHOP: “Modern Difference-in-Differences: New Problems, New Solutions” a cura di Scott Cunningham (Baylor University), autore di Causal Inference: The Mixtape.
Partendo dal semplice disegno 2×2 e dagli studi sugli eventi, il workshop affronta le violazioni delle tendenze parallele, i ben documentati problemi relativi agli effetti fissi a due vie in presenza di tempistiche di trattamento differenziali e gli stimatori ora proposti per risolverli, prima di passare all’analisi di sensibilità e ai disegni di trattamento continui. Scott conclude con indicazioni pratiche sulla diagnostica e sulla rendicontazione, illustrate attraverso esempi empirici in Stata.